<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting ready for Ruby 1.9.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walter Schreppers</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-8883</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Schreppers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-8883</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Well wanted to announce that latest passenger and ruby 1.9.1 is not working for me.
Without passenger I have a simple scaffolded app running here (regular script/mongrel) 
http://85.10.204.201:3000/books

With passenger, same app, same environment/server/database only now passenger serves the app and it runs here:
http://85.10.204.201/books -&gt; crashes on destroy, delete, update actions (which are just default scaffolded actions).

I don&#039;t seem to get answers on my ticket about this so might as well post it here.
Hope u can fix this soon cause I love passenger+rails ;) It basically gives me a 500 error and nothing is stated in apache logs nor development.log cause the app is just killed by passenger whenever it tries to write to database (or is it a session/cookies issue?).

Kind regards,
W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Well wanted to announce that latest passenger and ruby 1.9.1 is not working for me.<br />
Without passenger I have a simple scaffolded app running here (regular script/mongrel)<br />
<a href="http://85.10.204.201:3000/books" rel="nofollow">http://85.10.204.201:3000/books</a></p>
<p>With passenger, same app, same environment/server/database only now passenger serves the app and it runs here:<br />
<a href="http://85.10.204.201/books" rel="nofollow">http://85.10.204.201/books</a> -&gt; crashes on destroy, delete, update actions (which are just default scaffolded actions).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t seem to get answers on my ticket about this so might as well post it here.<br />
Hope u can fix this soon cause I love passenger+rails <img src='http://blog.phusion.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  It basically gives me a 500 error and nothing is stated in apache logs nor development.log cause the app is just killed by passenger whenever it tries to write to database (or is it a session/cookies issue?).</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phusion Passenger 2.1.1 (beta) released, thanks sponsors! &#171; Phusion Corporate Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5486</link>
		<dc:creator>Phusion Passenger 2.1.1 (beta) released, thanks sponsors! &#171; Phusion Corporate Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5486</guid>
		<description>[...] As announced here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As announced here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23 Useful Ruby 1.9 Links and Resources</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5376</link>
		<dc:creator>23 Useful Ruby 1.9 Links and Resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5376</guid>
		<description>[...] Getting ready for Ruby 1.9.1 - The Phusion guys (behind the excellent Passenger / mod_rails) give some tips regarding running Rails apps on Ruby 1.9.1. They explain that you must move on up to Rails 2.3, that you&#8217;ll need to patch a ton of gems, but that the latest build of Phusion Passenger will work happily with Ruby 1.9.1. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Getting ready for Ruby 1.9.1 &#8211; The Phusion guys (behind the excellent Passenger / mod_rails) give some tips regarding running Rails apps on Ruby 1.9.1. They explain that you must move on up to Rails 2.3, that you&#8217;ll need to patch a ton of gems, but that the latest build of Phusion Passenger will work happily with Ruby 1.9.1. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah Geisel</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5293</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah Geisel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5293</guid>
		<description>with 1.9.1&#039;s native threading, what happens when you enable config.threadsafe! in production.rb and fire up passenger? dare i dream?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with 1.9.1&#8217;s native threading, what happens when you enable config.threadsafe! in production.rb and fire up passenger? dare i dream?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrainBank</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5286</link>
		<dc:creator>BrainBank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5286</guid>
		<description>Sweet! I&#039;m going to try this out next weekend on a new slice and see how it goes. Hopefully people start making their gems 1.9.1 compatible in a hurry. Thanks for the amazing work Hongli and team!

~ Mel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet! I&#8217;m going to try this out next weekend on a new slice and see how it goes. Hopefully people start making their gems 1.9.1 compatible in a hurry. Thanks for the amazing work Hongli and team!</p>
<p>~ Mel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Listão de links sobre Ruby 1.9 &#124; Ruby Brasil</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5268</link>
		<dc:creator>Listão de links sobre Ruby 1.9 &#124; Ruby Brasil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5268</guid>
		<description>[...] Getting ready for Ruby 1.9.1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Getting ready for Ruby 1.9.1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick van Domburg</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5250</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick van Domburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5250</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s right underneath the commit at http://github.com/FooBarWidget/passenger/commit/0e43297b18f03e8b01c7c40897925b2ede6bc831.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s right underneath the commit at <a href="http://github.com/FooBarWidget/passenger/commit/0e43297b18f03e8b01c7c40897925b2ede6bc831" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/FooBarWidget/passenger/commit/0e43297b18f03e8b01c7c40897925b2ede6bc831</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hongli</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5225</link>
		<dc:creator>hongli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5225</guid>
		<description>@Roderick: We plan on porting the functionality to the 1.9 series in the long term.

Github disabled the comments feed, so I can&#039;t find nobu&#039;s comment. Could you provide a link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roderick: We plan on porting the functionality to the 1.9 series in the long term.</p>
<p>Github disabled the comments feed, so I can&#8217;t find nobu&#8217;s comment. Could you provide a link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23 Useful Ruby 1.9 Links and Resources &#171; A little story</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5222</link>
		<dc:creator>23 Useful Ruby 1.9 Links and Resources &#171; A little story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5222</guid>
		<description>[...] Getting ready for Ruby 1.9.1 - The Phusion guys (behind the excellent Passenger / mod_rails) give some tips regarding running Rails apps on Ruby 1.9.1. They explain that you must move on up to Rails 2.3, that you&#8217;ll need to patch a ton of gems, but that the latest build of Phusion Passenger will work happily with Ruby 1.9.1. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Getting ready for Ruby 1.9.1 &#8211; The Phusion guys (behind the excellent Passenger / mod_rails) give some tips regarding running Rails apps on Ruby 1.9.1. They explain that you must move on up to Rails 2.3, that you&#8217;ll need to patch a ton of gems, but that the latest build of Phusion Passenger will work happily with Ruby 1.9.1. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby 1.9.1 Library Compatibility Roundup &#124; Xingyu.zhang's Technology Circle</title>
		<link>http://blog.phusion.nl/2009/02/02/getting-ready-for-ruby-191/comment-page-1/#comment-5220</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby 1.9.1 Library Compatibility Roundup &#124; Xingyu.zhang's Technology Circle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phusion.nl/?p=78#comment-5220</guid>
		<description>[...] to have problems. Ryan Bigg detailed a list of issues that come up with using Rails on 1.9.1. The Phusion Passenger blog reports that their most recent version is compatible with 1.9.1, and detail which libraries [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to have problems. Ryan Bigg detailed a list of issues that come up with using Rails on 1.9.1. The Phusion Passenger blog reports that their most recent version is compatible with 1.9.1, and detail which libraries [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
